Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 29 — Labor · Part 2700 · § 2700.70

§ 2700.70. Petitions for discretionary review.

511 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t29/s§ 2700.70·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Procedure. Any person adversely affected or aggrieved by an ALJ's decision or order may file with the Commission a petition for discretionary review within 30 days after issuance of the decision or order. Filing of a petition for discretionary review is effective upon receipt. Two or more parties may join in the same petition; the Commission may consolidate related petitions. Procedures governing petitions for review of temporary reinstatement orders are found at § 2700.45(f).
(b)Review discretionary. Review by the Commission shall not be a matter of right but of the sound discretion of the Commission. Review by the Commission shall be granted only by affirmative vote of at least two of the Commissioners present and voting.
(c)Grounds. Petitions for discretionary review shall be filed only upon one or more of the following grounds:
(1)A finding or conclusion of material fact is not supported by substantial evidence;
(2)A necessary legal conclusion is erroneous;
(3)The decision is contrary to law or to the duly promulgated rules or decisions of the Commission;
(4)A substantial question of law, policy, or discretion is involved; or
(5)A prejudicial error of procedure was committed.
(d)Requirements. Each issue shall be separately numbered and plainly and concisely stated, and shall be supported by detailed citations to the record, when assignments of error are based on the record, and by statutes, regulations, or other principal authorities relied upon. Except by permission of the Commission and for good cause shown, petitions for discretionary review shall not exceed 35 pages. Except for good cause shown, no assignment of error by any party shall rely on any question of fact or law upon which the ALJ had not been afforded an opportunity to pass.
(e)Statement in opposition to petition. A statement in opposition to a petition for discretionary review may be filed, but the opportunity for such filing shall not require the Commission to delay its action on the petition.
(f)Motion for leave to exceed page limit. A motion requesting leave to exceed the page limit shall be received not less than 3 days prior to the date the petition for discretionary review is due to be filed, shall state the total number of pages proposed, and shall comply with § 2700.10. Filing of a motion requesting an extension of page limit is effective upon receipt. The motion and any statement in opposition shall include proof of service on all parties by a means of delivery no less expeditious than that used for filing the motion, except that if service by email or other electronic transmission is impossible, the filing party must serve in person, or by third-party commercial carrier, resulting in same-day delivery.
(g)Scope of review. If a petition is granted, review shall be limited to the issues raised by the petition, unless the Commission directs review of additional issues pursuant to § 2700.71.
(h)Denial of petition. A petition not granted within 40 days after the issuance of the ALJ's decision is deemed denied. \[90 FR 5625, Jan. 17, 2025\]
Connections14 cite this
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 2700.70
Petitions for discretionary review.
Fed. Reg.×14
Cites 0Cited by 14 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.